Y Combinator’s Paul Graham offers an insightful analysis on why this might just be a fine time to start a new company. He writes:
“If we’ve learned one thing from funding so many startups, it’s that they succeed or fail based on the qualities of the founders. The economy has some effect, certainly, but as a predictor of success it’s rounding error compared to the founders.
Which means that what matters is who you are, not when you do it. If you’re the right sort of person, you’ll win even in a bad economy. And if you’re not, a good economy won’t save you. Someone who thinks “I better not start a startup now, because the economy is so bad” is making the same mistake as the people who thought during the Bubble “all I have to do is start a startup, and I’ll be rich.”
Graham — who argues that technology startups aren’t as dependent on the general economy — points to Microsoft as an example of a company that was started in a down cycle.
“Technology progresses more or less independently of the stock market. So for any given idea, the payoff for acting fast in a bad economy will be higher than for waiting. Microsoft’s first product was a Basic interpreter for the Altair. That was exactly what the world needed in 1975, but if Gates and Allen had decided to wait a few years, it would have been too late.”
A good read.

1 response so far ↓
1 Thug // Oct 17, 2008 at 3:32 pm
This is a fantastic observation! Smart Innovators with solid ideas should move forward and the funding will take care of itself. Ofcourse one should make sure that the dynamics and foundation are strong (much like Apple and MS did back in the day).
I think the dot com bubble had a lot of “false” business ideas with no plan for market success.
Leave a Comment